Sunday, February 12, 2012
 
 
  Home arrow Abstinence arrow Teaching Abstinence arrow Whose "Medically Accurate" Info Should We Use?
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note
Abortion Increases the Risk of Premature Babies?

Published in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Canadian researchers found that women who had undergone a first or second trimester of pregnancy, when most abortions are conducted, increased the risk of low birth-weight babies and premature babies 35 and 36 per cent respectively.
 
Those women who had undergone more than one abortion had a 72 per cent increased risk for low birth weight and 93 per cent risk of prematurity.
 
The figures come from an analysis of 37 studies around the world, carried out between 1965 and 2001, to discover reasons why babies are born underweight and premature.

There are approximately 60 studies linking abortion to prematurity and low birth weight.

African American women abort at about 3 times the rate of white women in the USA. They also by far have the most prematurity and low birth weight babies...

So why don't we hear about this??

Let's get the word out!!

 
Whose "Medically Accurate" Info Should We Use? PDF Print E-mail

The Medical Institute is offering training in Medical Accuracy in 2008. Contact the Medical Institute at 512.328.6268 for information.

 

Project Reality Announces Online Training in 2008
Project Reality is now offering online courses for the Navigator teacher training curriculum. This curriculum is used in grades 8 through 12. Contact Project Reality to find out about participating in this World Class Training: Project Reality's Florida office 239.659.1095.

 

Perhaps you have heard the media pushing the line that all sex education - including abstinence education programs - must provide "medically accurate" information in the classroom presentations.

Certainly, this is a noble concept, and very necessary.

However, who provides this "medically accurate" information?

The anti-abstinence "safe sex" promoters say that they, and only they, have "medically accurate" information which must be provided to our children.

Their information promotes the use of condoms (including how to put them on), chemical contraceptives, and abortion, while promoting all types of "outercourse", including mutual masturbation. They also promote the morning after pill (emergency contraception) and fight legal battles against parental notification/consent for abortion among minors.

Abstinence until marriage educators on the other hand, have researched the CDC, NIH, and other federal agencies and well-respected statisticians to collect the most up-to-date, "medically accurate" information available, and it supports the teaching of abstinence until marriage to our children.

Abstinence educators are concerned about the life-long physical and emotional health of young people, which is greatly compromised by non-marital sexual activity.

Of course, anti-abstinence "safe sex" promoters such as Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, Advocates for Youth, and other such groups, including condom and contraceptive manufacturers, recognize that abstinence until marriage would put them out of business.

So, when you hear the anti-abstinence groups claim that abstinence until marriage groups are not using "medically accurate" information, are mis-informing children about the actual medical facts, and are putting teens in danger of acquiring STDs or getting pregnant, remember that these same anti-abstinence groups have had the federal money and power for about 60 years and then consider how STDs and out-of-wedlock pregnancies have sky-rocketed in that time. Studies show that funding for "safe sex" programs and condom distribution is directly proportional to the increase in STD infections and out-of-wedlock pregnancies and births.

Then, keep in mind that Abstinence Until Marriage groups which finally gained some recognition around 1993-1995 and which have grown in number and funding since that time, have seen a 57% decrease in teen births in that time. True, unwed births are increasing, but among women aged 25 and older; among teens, pregnancies, births and abortions have all generally decreased.

 

For more information on how to stand against the anti-abstinence "medically accurate" push, visit...

"Medical Accuracy"
http://www.teen-aid.org/Abstinence_Education/Insight_Articles/Medical_Accuracy.htm

 

 
< Prev   Next >


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2012 All Rights Reserved