|
Terminally-Ill Patient Loses 'Right-To-Food" Case
Terminal Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Supplemental Oxygen
'Peaceful Pill' Promoted by Australian Nitschke
Peter Singer Defends His Views on Killing Disabled Babies Via Infanticide
Volunteers in U.S. Death With Dignity Program Admit Actively Assisting Suicides
Teen Suicide Epidemic Puzzles the Netherlands
Terri Schiavo's Father Reacts
Persistent Vegetative State & Ambien (zolpidem)
'I Felt Trapped Inside My Body'
BURKE LOSES "RIGHT-TO-FOOD" CASE. Terminally-ill patient Leslie Burke, 46, has lost the last stage of a legal challenge for the right to receive nutrition and drink when he is close to death, his lawyers said.
Burke, who has a degenerative brain condition, fears artificial nutrition could be stopped against his wishes when he cannot talk anymore. Burke was seeking to overturn a ruling made by the Court of Appeal in London last year, which said it would be lawful for doctors to refuse him artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH). The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg said in a written judgement released to Burke and the government last week that it had declined his appeal.
Burke learnt of the court's decision while attending the funeral of his brother in Ireland who died after suffering from the same genetic condition, Friedreich's ataxia. The condition causes lack of coordination, but does not affect mental faculties.
Burke said he was "extremely disappointed" with the ruling. "I only hope that if I am lucky enough to be in hospital, that the doctors treating me will not believe at some stage that it will be in my best interests for ANH to be withdrawn even when death is imminent, effectively letting me die of starvation and thirst when I am no longer able to communicate my wishes. I will be making a living will, even though it will give me no comfort, for as it stands living wills are not legally binding and can be disregarded if the wishes contained in it conflict with the doctor's view." The Strasbourg court said that it was satisfied that the presumption of UK law was in favour of prolonging life wherever possible in accordance with the spirit of the Convention on Human Rights, Burke's lawyers said.
As a result it decided that Burke had failed to establish that under UK law he faced a real or imminent risk that food or drink would be withdrawn leading to a painful death by thirst. Burke's lawyer, Muiris Lyons of Irwin Mitchell Solicitors, said his client had now done all he could legally. "Leslie wanted to have his position in law clarified now, before he loses competency to determine his own best interests. "The Court has effectively determined that his application is premature," he said. "However, once he loses the capacity to make his own decisions he will also lose the ability to make such an application in his own right. It is a "Catch 22" situation for him," he added. [LONDON Reuters, http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=1151812006]
TERMINAL WITHDRAWAL OF LIFE-SUSTAINING SUPPLEMENTAL OXYGEN. First 150 words of the full text: An influential report released in 1983 defined life-sustaining therapies as "all health care interventions that have the effect of increasing the life span of the patient."1
This definition is highly inclusive: aspirin for stable coronary artery disease, intravenous antibiotics for osteomyelitis, and mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure all qualify. However, when considering withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining interventions, clinicians commonly refer to a more discrete group of therapies intended to forestall impending death by augmenting or replacing a vital bodily function.
A hallmark of life-sustaining therapies, therefore, is that withholding or withdrawing them leads to physiologic decompensation foreseeably to cardiac arrest. Supplemental oxygen has not commonly been considered a life-sustaining therapy. Yet it clearly serves this purpose for spontaneously breathing patients in whom pulmonary gas exchange is so impaired that the needs of vital organs cannot be met with ambient air... [JAMA. 2006;296:1397-1400. Terminal Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Supplemental Oxygen, Scott D. Halpern, MD, PhD, MBioethics; John Hansen-Flaschen, MD; Vol. 296 No. 11, 20Sept06, http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/296/11/1397?etoc; N Valko RN]
[Comment: Although I can't get the entire article here, it's truly outrageous to consider withdrawing such a simple comfort treatment ALREADY in use when, apparently, the only possible reason is to hasten death. Unfortunately, I've seen this done with the so-called "terminal weans" involving people who don't die fast enough after being removed from ventilators and I've seen people gasping for air even though apparently unconscious. I protested vigorously when this first happened and fortunately, this stopped in my hospital-for the time being. N.V.]
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/296/11/1397?etoc; N Valko RN]
[Comment: Although I can't get the entire article here, it's truly outrageous to consider withdrawing such a simple comfort treatment ALREADY in use when, apparently, the only possible reason is to hasten death. Unfortunately, I've seen this done with the so-called "terminal weans" involving people who don't die fast enough after being removed from ventilators and I've seen people gasping for air even though apparently unconscious. I protested vigorously when this first happened and fortunately, this stopped in my hospital-for the time being. N.V.]
'PEACEFUL PILL' PROMOTED BY AUSTRALIAN FOUNDER OF SUICIDE GROUP. Philip Nitschke, an Australian doctor who promotes suicide as a way to die has introduced a new "peaceful pill" plan to advocates at a conference, touting the pill for its accessibility – and legality. In a report on Canadian Television, Dr. Philip Nitschke of Exit International said that his plan allows for the self-appointed date with death he advocates. "If you can manage things yourself you don't break laws," he said about the instructions in his book on the subject. The book describes a lethal barbiturate concoction that acts by depressing the central nervous system, and observers say it appears similar to drugs used in the few countries where euthanasia is allowed.
In Australia, Nitschke is faced with a law that prohibits even giving how-to consultations on suicide and he has moved his group's website to New Zealand to avoid that conflict. In Canada, a proposal to allow assisted suicide died at the conclusion of a recent Parliament, and in the United States, only one state, Oregon, now allows physicians to prescribe medications to be used for suicide. Nitschke said that volunteers with his organization donated several thousand dollars to assemble a lab at a New South Wales farm where they were able to put the drug into a crystalline form.
Nitschke, who has been discussing the concept of such a pill for several years, said 100 people already are waiting to use it...Focus analysts, however, argue that this was the same way that the Nazi extermination of groups of people began: first with the old and infirm, then the handicapped, and eventually entire blocks of people just because they belonged to that group.
In the U.S., Vermont at one point considered the "Death With Dignity Act'' and California has reviewed a plan, but Oregon's physician-assisted suicide plan has been approved by the courts. [14Sept06, WorldNetDaily.com; LifeSiteNews.com; http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51969] Euthanasia radicals are always trying to pretend that all they want is access to assisted suicide for the terminally ill in unbearable pain for whom nothing can be done to alleviate suffering. This is a false premise, of course. But it is not the true agenda, which is really about eventually getting to the place of near death on demand. Proof of this assertion can be found in the ongoing World Federation of Right to Die Societies Convention in Toronto. One of the prime presenters at the conference is Australian physician and euthanasia absolutist Philip Nitschke, who was paid thousands of dollars by the Hemlock Society (now merged into the euphemistically named Compassion and Choices) to develop the "peaceful pill," a suicide concoction that is designed to allow ready access to suicide for those who live in countries where assisted suicide and euthanasia are illegal. [by Wesley J. Smith; LifeNews.com, 13Sept06]
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51969] Euthanasia radicals are always trying to pretend that all they want is access to assisted suicide for the terminally ill in unbearable pain for whom nothing can be done to alleviate suffering. This is a false premise, of course. But it is not the true agenda, which is really about eventually getting to the place of near death on demand. Proof of this assertion can be found in the ongoing World Federation of Right to Die Societies Convention in Toronto. One of the prime presenters at the conference is Australian physician and euthanasia absolutist Philip Nitschke, who was paid thousands of dollars by the Hemlock Society (now merged into the euphemistically named Compassion and Choices) to develop the "peaceful pill," a suicide concoction that is designed to allow ready access to suicide for those who live in countries where assisted suicide and euthanasia are illegal. [by Wesley J. Smith; LifeNews.com, 13Sept06]
PETER SINGER DEFENDS HIS VIEWS ON KILLING DISABLED BABIES VIA INFANTICIDE. Princeton University philosophy professor Peter Singer came under international condemnation when he announced he favors killing disabled babies via infanticide. Though he was blasted from both sides of the political spectrum, the so-called ethicist still holds to the position.
In an interview with The Independent newspaper in England, Singer said he would definitely kill a disabled newborn baby. He indicated he would do so "if that was in the best interests of the baby and of the family as a whole."
Singer said he found it surprising that abortion advocates would disagree with his views. "Many people find this shocking, yet they support a woman's right to have an abortion," Singer said. Meanwhile, he claimed he had one point of common beliefs with pro-life advocates. "One point on which I agree with opponents of abortion is that, from the point of view of ethics rather than the law, there is no sharp distinction between the fetus and the newborn baby," Singer explained. However, Singer's view is that, instead of legal protection, both disabled babies and the unborn deserve death.
VOLUNTEERS IN US DEATH WITH DIGNITY "Client Support Program" ADMIT ACTIVELY ASSISTING SUICIDES. At an international meeting of euthanasia and assisted suicide organizations [Toronto 1-9September06] spokesmen from the US-based group, Compassion and Choices, admitted that their Client Support Program is an active assisted suicide program.
They revealed that program trains volunteers to assist their clients to kill themselves while remaining technically within the law.
Ostensibly strictly for purposes of disseminating information to people who are seeking “choices” at the end of their lives, Helen Beum the program’s director said it has 130 volunteers spanning 27 U.S. states. Program volunteers who spoke at the conference, were forthright about their involvement in assisting suicides.
Though most of the clients who called only received information and counselling and went no further, they said, some who called were actively assisted to kill themselves by the program. Beum said the Client Support Program is an active assisted suicide program that trains volunteers to “journey” with and at times assist their clients to kill themselves.
The volunteers explained that the program training is careful to skirt the law but not step over the line, doing everything possible to arrange for someone to commit suicide other than physically doing the act.
Beum admitted that the volunteers sometimes quit in frustration because they perceive that the process of helping clients to die is too restricted by the laws. Sam F., a volunteer who spoke at the conference, described how he was “passionate about hastening death,” saying he was a “minister” for 40 years and witnessed many people suffer while dying. He had been involved with his first hastened death a few weeks previous and felt that it was the “right thing to do.”
Another volunteer, Judy S. (Cincinnati) promoted the idea of assisted suicide as a cost-cutting measure for health care, saying that the cost for medical technology is often a “waste of money” for patients who are close to death.
Alex Schadenberg [Executive Dir, Canada’s Euthanasia Prevention Coalition] who attended the conference, said the Client Support Program is a “key component of Compassion and Choices’ structure”. Compassion and Choices tries to sell themselves as a group oriented to “more choices”, not to assisted suicide per se,” said Schadenberg. “But in practice, the choice they actually give support for is suicide.”
The group that sponsored the conference, Canada’s Dying with Dignity, also has a Client Support Program that received $177,800 from the Trillium foundation. The Canadian group’s program, also called the Client Support Program, was coached by Compassion and Choices and their staff and volunteers receive the same training as their US counterparts.
Ontario’s Trillium Foundation, one of Canada’s largest philanthropic foundations, sponsors a number of groups and events including the Toronto Gay Pride Week activities, and Toronto’s annual Women’s Health Conference at which local school children are given contraceptives and attend panels on various sexual techniques.
The Toronto conference, sponsored by Dying with Dignity, Canada’s largest right to die organization, and the World Federation of Right to Die Societies, featured speakers and representatives from groups around the world, with about 220 attendees. Most organizations represented engage in a range of activities from direct client involvement to lobbying governments for legalization.
Related : Independent Inquiry Demanded for Funding of Toronto Pro-Euthanasia Group http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2003/feb/03020702.html
[White, Toronto, 19Sept06 LifeSiteNews.com]
TEEN SUICIDE EPIDEMIC PUZZLES THE NETHERLANDS: IT SHOULDN'T. This is an excellent column by Colleen Carroll Campbell, a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC). Apparently, a teenage "suicide craze" has hit the Netherlands and the government wonders why. But Campbell knows. The Dutch do "not seem to grasp the obvious," she writes. "The law is a teacher and Dutch law has taught its young citizens well. The radical and sweeping embrace of suicide as an answer to the problem of human suffering, and the elevation of euthanasia to the status of a basic human right, has convinced Dutch teenagers that suicide must be a noble act, the kind that wins plaudits, prestige, and even legal protection.
"Adults can preach all they want about the evils of suicide to their teenage charges, but when asked why suicide is wrong for some people in some situations while fine for others, supporters of Dutch euthanasia laws will be hard pressed to offer an answer that passes muster with any reasonably intelligent 12-year-old. So Dutch children will continue to see suicide as a reasonable, even admirable solution to the difficulties of daily life. And the culture of death in the Netherlands will march on."
This seems unassailable, to me. And we see the same paradigm beginning to unfold in Oregon where the Department of Health is worried about a spike in elder suicide. Either killing is an acceptable answer to human suffering of whatever cause, or it isn't. Mixed messages don't stick.
LEARNING FROM DEADLY DUTCH MISTAKES
The Netherlands has earned a dubious distinction in recent years as one of the suicide capitals of the world. Euthanasia of adults and teenagers has been legal there since 2002 and the Dutch Royal Medical Association recently made international headlines by persuading the Dutch government to establish a committee to regulate infant euthanasia. Not that doctors there needed the government’s blessing to practice their healing arts: By their own accounting, Dutch physicians had already been euthanizing about 15 sick babies each year. (See: http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/campbell200603130818.asp)
Euthanasia advocates hail the Dutch model as progressive and reasonable, offering a humane escape from this fallen world for everyone from terminally ill cancer patients to depressed adolescents and sickly infants. If they want to die (or, in the case of newborns, if their parents wish they had never been born), who has the right to stop them?
Given that logic – which must be widely accepted in the Netherlands if politicians and physicians could sanction the killing of children with impunity – the reaction of Dutch authorities to a recent outbreak of teen suicide fever is a bit puzzling. A few days ago, news reports (http://in.news.yahoo.com/060820/43/66t2a.html) surfaced about a group of a dozen 12- to 15-year-old Dutch girls who were using text messages on their cell phones and taunting e-mails to urge each other on to suicide, peppering friends with messages like “Who dares to?” One student finally grew frightened enough to contact authorities. An army of police, physicians, and social workers soon pounced on the case and did their best to unravel the reasons behind the suicide craze. Experts speculated in the press about the pernicious power of peer pressure, the insidious influence of the Internet, and the bizarre teenage impression that suicide is glamorous. As one Dutch psychiatrist mused to a reporter, suicide seems to carry a certain degree of prestige among teenagers but, “We don’t know why.”
The good doctor, like his colleagues, did not seem to grasp the obvious: The law is a teacher and Dutch law has taught its young citizens well. The radical and sweeping embrace of suicide as an answer to the problem of human suffering, and the elevation of euthanasia to the status of a basic human right, has convinced Dutch teenagers that suicide must be a noble act, the kind that wins plaudits, prestige, and even legal protection.
Adults can preach all they want about the evils of suicide to their teenage charges, but when asked why suicide is wrong for some people in some situations while fine for others, supporters of Dutch euthanasia laws will be hard pressed to offer an answer that passes muster with any reasonably intelligent 12-year-old. So Dutch children will continue to see suicide as a reasonable, even admirable solution to the difficulties of daily life. And the culture of death in the Netherlands will march on. The question is: Will we learn from their mistakes? [C C Campbell, 25Aug06
http://politicalmavens.com/index.php/2006/08/25/learning-from-deadly-dutch-mistakes]
TERRI SCHIAVO'S FATHER REACTS. A 23-yr-old woman, supposedly in a "vegetative state" stunned doctors by responding to certain commands asked of her. The results have been displayed in brain imaging showing more is going on in her head than meets the eye.
Although the unnamed woman can't move or speak, she has responded to sentences spoken to her and even played an imaginary game of tennis in her head, her doctors say.
The results have all been recorded on a brain scanner and show that disabled patients like Terri Schiavo or those who are comatose may be much more aware than they appear. Terri’s father, Robert Schindler, agrees and, in a statement, said the case shows more should have been done to save his daughter's life and to listen to experts who said she wasn't as bad off as her former husband made it appear.
“This new case is not surprising to our family," Schindler said. "We are seeing a growing amount of evidence indicating that the diagnosis of ‘Persistent Vegetative State’ (PVS) is often misdiagnosed, resulting in dangerous and potentially fatal consequences for people with brain injuries, as documented in this new account of a brain injured woman," he explained.
"The danger of the PVS diagnosis is that it is being used as a reason to kill innocent people with disabilities, like Terri," her father added. "We believe that this PVS diagnosis is inhumane and it should be abolished.” [11Sept06, LifeNews.com]
Under the leadership of neuroscientist Dr. Adrian Owen, the team of scientists from Cambridge University and the Belgian University of Liège applied MRI technology to discover that the brain activity of a PVS patient indicated she was “consciously aware of herself and her surroundings.”
In their experiment, the researchers gave oral commands to a 23-year-old comatose Englishwoman, who fulfilled all the requirements of a “persistent vegetative state”, while they measured her brain activity with an MRI scanner. According to the researchers, the woman showed increased activity in speech comprehension centers in her brain while researchers spoke to her, indicating comprehension.
When the researchers asked her to imagine herself playing tennis and walking through the rooms of her home, the imaging screen showed activity in the woman’s brain areas governing visual-spatial and motor functions: all patterns similarly observed in healthy volunteers. In their report, Dr. Owen and his scientists wrote, "Despite fulfilling the clinical criteria for a diagnosis of vegetative state, this patient retained the ability to understand spoken commands and to respond to them through her brain activity, rather than through speech or movement. Moreover, her decision to cooperate with the authors by imagining particular tasks when asked to do so represents a clear act of intention, which confirmed beyond any doubt that she was consciously aware of herself and her surroundings," they stated in the September 8 issue of Science. [Peter J. Smith, 15Sept06 LifeSiteNews.com]
PVS & AMBIEN. We have always been told there is no recovery from persistent vegetative state. But across three continents, severely brain-damaged patients are awake and talking after taking ... a sleeping pill. And no one is more baffled than the GP who made the breakthrough.
For three years, Riaan Bolton has lain motionless, his eyes open but unseeing. After a devastating car crash doctors said he would never again see or speak or hear. Now his mother, Johanna, dissolves a pill in a little water on a teaspoon and forces it gently into his mouth. Within half an hour, as if a switch has been flicked in his brain, Riaan looks around his home in the South African town of Kimberley and says, "Hello."
Shortly after his accident, Johanna had turned down the option of letting him die. Three hundred miles away, Louis Viljoen, a young man who had once been cruelly described by a doctor as "a cabbage", greets me with a mischievous smile and a streetwise four-move handshake. Until he took the pill, he too was supposed to be in what doctors call a persistent vegetative state.
Across the Atlantic in the United States, George Melendez, who is also brain-damaged, has lain twitching and moaning as if in agony for years, causing his parents unbearable grief. He, too, is given this little tablet and again, it's as if a light comes on. His father asks him if he is, indeed, in pain. "No," George smiles, and his family burst into tears.
These awakenings have come as the result of an accidental discovery by a dedicated - and bewildered - GP. They have all woken up, paradoxically, after being given a commonly used sleeping pill. Across three continents, brain-damaged patients are reporting remarkable improvements after taking a pill that should make them fall asleep but that, instead, appears to be waking up cells in their brains that were thought to have been dead.
In the next two months, trials on patients are expected to begin in South Africa aimed at finding out exactly what is going on inside their heads. Because, at the moment, the results are baffling doctors. The remarkable story of this pill and its active ingredient, zolpidem, begins in 1994 when Louis Viljoen, a sporty 24-year-old switchboard operator, was hit by a truck while riding his bike in Springs, a small town 30 minutes' drive east of Johannesburg. He suffered severe brain injuries that left him in a deep coma. He was treated in various hospitals before being settled in the Ikaya Tinivorster rehabilitation centre nearby.
Doctors expected him to die and told his mother, Sienie Engelbrecht, that he would never regain consciousness. "His eyes were open but there was nothing there," says Sienie, a sales rep. "I visited him every day for five years and we would speak to him but there was no recognition, no communication, nothing."
The hospital ward sister, Lucy Hughes, was periodically concerned that involuntary spasms in Louis's left arm, that resulted in him tearing at his mattress, might be a sign that deep inside he might be uncomfortable. In 1999, five years after Louis's accident, she suggested to Sienie that the family's GP, Dr Wally Nel, be asked to prescribe a sedative.
Nel prescribed Stilnox, the brand name in South Africa for zolpidem. "I crushed it up and gave it to him in a bottle with a soft drink," Sienie recalls. "He couldn't swallow properly then, but I helped him and sat at his bedside. After about 25 minutes, I heard him making a sound like 'mmm'. He hadn't made a sound for five years. "Then he turned his head in my direction. I said, 'Louis, can you hear me?' And he said, 'Yes.' I said, 'Say hello, Louis', and he said, 'Hello, mummy.' I couldn't believe it. I just cried and cried."
Hughes was called over and other staff members gathered in disbelief. "Sienie told me he was talking and I said he couldn't be - it wasn't possible," she recalls. "Then I heard him. His mother was speechless and so were we. It was a very emotional moment."
Louis has now been given Stilnox every day for seven years. Although the effects of the drug are supposed to wear off after about two and a quarter hours, and zolpidem's power as a sedative means it cannot simply be taken every time a patient slips out of consciousness, his improvement continues as if long-dormant pathways in his brain are coming back to life.
I see Louis before his daily medication, yet he is conscious where once he would have been comatose. Almost blind because of a separate and deteriorating condition, there is a droop to one side of his mouth and brow because of brain damage. His right arm is twisted awkwardly into his side.
Louis is given a pill, and I watch.
It is 8.30am. After nine minutes the grey pallor disappears and his face flushes. He starts smiling and laughing. After 10 minutes he begins asking questions. His speech is impaired because of the brain damage and the need, several years ago, to remove all his teeth, but I can understand him. A couple of minutes later, his right arm becomes less contorted and the facial drooping lessens. After 15 minutes he reaches out to hug Sienie. He pulls off her wedding ring and asks what it is. "It's a suffer-ring," she jokes. And he says, "Well, if you're suffering, you should make a plan!" The banter continues and he remembers conversations from the previous day and adds to them.
"Louis," I ask, "do you feel any change in awareness before and after the pill?" "No," he says. "None whatsoever." Whatever is happening, he feels the same. "How do you know this is your mother?" I ask, referring to Sienie. Remember, Louis cannot see. He says: "Because I recognise her voice and I know she loves me."
Nel was as amazed at Louis' awakening as everyone else.
"Something strange and wonderful is happening here, and we have to get to the bottom of it," he says. "Since Louis, I have treated more than 150 brain-damaged patients with zolpidem and have seen improvements in about 60% of them. It's remarkable."
After Louis' awakening was publicised in the South African media, Dr Ralf Clauss, a physician of nuclear medicine - the use of radioactive isotopes in diagnostic scans - at the Medical University of Southern Africa, contacted Nel to suggest carrying out a scan on Louis.
"The results were so unbelievable that I got other colleagues to check my findings," says Clauss, who now works at the Royal Surrey County Hospital in Guildford. "We did scans before and after we gave Louis zolpidem. Areas that appeared black and dead beforehand began to light up with activity afterwards. I was dumbfounded - and I still am."
Clauss says immediate improvements in the left parietal lobe and the left lentiform nucleus were visible. In lay terms, these are important for motor function, sight, speech and hearing.
"I remember saying to Dr Nel that we were witnessing medical history," says Clauss.
No one yet knows exactly how a sleeping pill could wake up the seemingly dead brain cells, but Nel and Clauss have a hypothesis. After the brain has suffered severe trauma, a chemical known as Gaba (gamma amino butyric acid) closes down brain functions in order to conserve energy and help cells survive. However, in such a long-term dormant state, the receptors in the brain cells that respond to Gaba become hypersensitive, and as Gaba is a depressant, it causes a persistent vegetative state.
It is thought that during this process the receptors are in some way changed or deformed so that they respond to zolpidem differently from normal receptors, thus breaking the hold of Gaba. This could mean that instead of sending patients to sleep as usual, it makes dormant areas of the brain function again and some comatose patients wake up.
In Kimberley, the once booming home of the De Beers diamond empire, Riaan Bolton's family heard of Nel's work after he and Clauss had papers published in the medical journal NeuroRehabilitation and the New England Journal of Medicine several months ago. Riaan suffered severe brain trauma when he was thrown from a car in a traffic accident in July 2003. A keen cricketer and rugby player, the 23-year-old was studying to become an industrial engineer but still found time to play guitar in a band.
"One specialist said he had a 5% chance of recovering, another said he had no chance whatsoever of regaining consciousness," says his mother, Johanna. She and her husband, Tinus, spend about £1,000 a month on round-the-clock care for their son in a converted garage at their home, but until June they had seen no sign of awareness in him. Then they asked their doctor, Clive Holroyd, to contact Nel for advice.
"There was no movement, no recognition, just nothing," says Tinus. "Then we gave him the pill and we noticed him moving the fingers in his left hand and touching them against each other. His eyes went big and he began looking from left to right.
"The doctor started asking Riaan questions. He said, 'Look at me, Riaan' and Riaan looked straight at him and focused on his face. Then the doctor asked him to move his hand and he moved it. And then he lifted his head from the pillow and began looking around. I couldn't believe it."
I watch as Riaan is given his medication. As with Louis, his face flushes and his eyes begin to sparkle and focus within minutes. Gone is the 1,000-yard stare. He hugs his mother and looks at her face, but even though I am amazed, the family reckon this isn't his best day so far. They show me a number of DVDs they shot in July. In them, Riaan responds to questioning, nods and shakes his head, drinks through a straw, often laughs and says, 'Hello.' He remains severely brain damaged, but there is clear evidence of understanding and communication.
"It has given us hope," says Johanna. "To have communication with him again, to know he becomes aware of us and to tell him we love him - knowing he can hear us - is simply beyond belief. It has been a very moving experience."
Holroyd remains perplexed. "There is a measurement of the depths of coma called the Glasgow scale, with three being the worst and 15 being normal," he says. "Riaan was six, but within 10 minutes of taking the pill he is up to nine. It's simply unbelievable. And the mind-boggling thing about this is that it's done with a sleeping pill.
"Some time ago, Riaan had a cardiac arrest and it was a difficult call as to whether or not to resuscitate him. His mother insisted he should be, and look at him now. From now on, this will cause serious ethical issues over whether to let such coma victims die." Those issues became even more complicated last week, when a British woman believed to be in a persistent vegetative state astonished doctors by responding to their voices.
Although these awakenings are the most dramatic aspect of the zolpidem phenomenon, Percy Lomax, the chief executive of ReGen Therapeutics, the British company funding the South African trials, believes Nel's work with less brain-damaged patients could be the most significant.
Many stroke victims, patients with head injuries and those whose brains have been deprived of oxygen, such as near-drowning cases, have reported significant improvement in speech, motor functions and concentration after taking the drug.
"The potential for this drug is enormous," says Lomax. "ReGen has applied for a patent to use the drug, now out of patent and generically available, for the treatment of secondary brain injury after brain trauma. The object of the clinical trial is to scientifically establish that the compound works in the way it has been shown to work in individual cases. It will be carried out on patients known to react well to zolpidem, and by lowering the dosage it is hoped that the sedative side-effects will be reduced but the brain stimulation will still continue.
"It may be that further research will allow us to better understand the way the drug works and to develop a new generation of better-targeted pharmaceuticals." He says market research estimates the potential market for zolpidem in brain-damaged patents could top $4.3bn (£2.3bn).
The company that first developed zolpidem, Sanofi-Aventis, was contacted by Nel and Clauss but appears to have chosen not to become involved in the trials or the use of the drug on brain-damaged patients.
Instead, the brain scans on up to 30 patients will be carried out at the Pretoria Academic Hospital by Professor Mike Sathekge, head of nuclear medicine, and Professor Ben Meyer, one of South Africa's most renowned physicians.
"The results so far could be potentially very important," says Meyer. "We have never before spoken of damaged cells in the brain going into hibernation - we have thought of them as necrotic, or dead, cells. But we know cells can go into hibernation in the heart and thyroid, so why not the brain? If there are hibernating cells in damaged brains, it may be that this drug helps to wake them in some people."
In South Africa, I meet a procession of brain-damaged patients who feel the drug has changed their lives for the better. There is 32-year-old Miss X, who can't be named for legal reasons. She suffered four cardiac arrests and hypoxia, a lack of oxygen to the brain, when a hospital's apparent failure to diagnose a gall bladder problem resulted in her contracting septicaemia four years ago. She can barely stand, her arms are in spasm, she cannot speak - although her intelligence has not been affected - and the left side of her face droops. She was given zolpidem for the first time just a week before I saw her and her parents say the improvement was such that she has come back for more.
Miss X is given a pill by Nel at 4.37pm. By 4.50 the left side of her face is no longer drooping, her eyes sparkle and she smiles broadly. At 5.02, her arms have relaxed enough for her to fold them and she is laughing with her parents. Ten minutes later, she stands up, stretches to her full height and claps her hands.
Using a card keyboard, she spells out answers to questions I have for her. "Can you use the keyboard more quickly with the medication?" She answers: "Yes." Does she feel an improvement? "Yes, I am not falling over. I am not coughing so much. I can swallow easier. I feel my limbs are much more relaxed." But does she feel more tired? "No". What is she hoping for? "To talk again. I'd love to be able to call my cats to come to me."
At 5.22pm, Miss X issues a long, drawn-out "Wall-eeee!" and hugs Nel.
Then there is Wynand Claasens, 22, who suffered severe brain damage five years ago when he was assaulted outside his school. A series of subsequent strokes left him wheelchair-bound, depressed and aggressive. He used to be a long-distance runner. Nel gave him Stilnox for the first time in early July this year. "I was struggling to walk, my left eye was hanging lower and was smaller than my right eye, I was feeling very angry, I had pains in my knees and I was having trouble going to the toilet," Wynand says. "Now I'm walking with one stick, my face has evened up, I can go to the toilet when I'm ready and the pain in my knees has gone. I take one 10mg tablet each night and I feel about 60% better."
The list goes on. Heidi Greven, who is now 21, was starved of oxygen to her brain at birth. Her mother, Babs, says she used to sit in silence, locked inside her own head, never communicating and looking terribly unhappy. When I meet Heidi, she is walking around, curious about everything. She examines the shorthand in my notebook. Although too shy to speak (she will always be brain damaged), she jokes with Nel. At home, she now chats with her parents.
"I'll never forget the first time she was given the medication," says Babs. "It was in July 2002. After 10 to 15 minutes it was like a curtain being lifted from her eyes. I couldn't believe it. She suddenly started looking around and fiddling with magazines. Then she went outside the door and looked into the other rooms in the surgery. She found a portable radio and put it up to her shoulder and began listening to it. Beforehand, she would just sit there doing nothing.
"That was a Saturday. When she went to [a special] school on the Monday, her teacher sent a note home asking what we had done to make Heidi come alive."
There are others, too: Paul Ras, a 69-year-old runner who suffered brain damage after a traffic accident. Now he is convinced zolpidem is responsible for a recovery that allows him to run races up to 50km - with only one hip.
And Theo van Rensburg, a 43-year-old lawyer who suffered severe brain injuries in a car crash in 1991. He also suffered a stroke while in a coma for three months. He took Stilnox in 1999 and reported an improvement in balance, co-ordination, speech and hearing.
"I go horse-riding now," he says. He still has difficulty speaking, but I can understand him. "It's really good for my balance."
Finally, I meet 22-year-old Janli de Koch, whose eyesight was damaged in a car accident in Switzerland in December 2004. The injury resulted in a restriction of her visual field to two corners of her eyes; she cannot see below a certain point, so that she bumps into things and falls over. Last month, she was prescribed zolpidem and now says she can already see more than she used to. She hopes the improvements will continue.
In 1969 the neurologist Dr Oliver Sacks used the then new drug L-Dopa to awaken a group of catatonic patients who had survived the 1917-1928 epidemic of the mysterious "sleeping disease", known as encephalitis lethargica.
The 1990 film Awakenings chronicles Sacks' delight at his patients' progress and his despair when the medication stops working and they slip back into a catatonic state. The hope with zolpidem is that the improvements will continue and there will be no regression. In the patients who have used the medication longest - such as Louis Viljoen and Theo van Rensburg - the signs are that progress continues. But time will tell.
Perhaps the last word should go to Pat Flores, the mother of George Melendez, the 31-year-old coma patient who reassured his parents that he wasn't in pain after taking Ambien, as zolpidem is known in the US. He was starved of oxygen when his car overturned and he landed face down in a garden pond near his home in Houston, Texas, in 1998. "The doctors said he was clinically dead - one said he was a vegetable," says Pat. "After three weeks he suffered multi-organ failure and they said his body would ultimately succumb. They said he would never regain consciousness."
He survived and four years later, while visiting a clinic, Pat gave him a sleeping pill because his constant moaning was keeping her and her husband, Del, awake in their shared hotel room. "After 10 to 15 minutes I noticed there was no sound and I looked over," she recalls. "Instead of finding him asleep, there he was, wide awake, looking at his surroundings. I said, 'George', and he said, 'What?' We sat up for two hours asking him questions and he answered all of them.
His improvements have continued and we talk every day. He has a terrific sense of humour and he carries on running jokes from the day before.
"It is difficult to describe how it feels to get someone back who you were told you had lost for ever. There is a bond that has been restored and it validates our absolute belief that all along George was locked inside there somewhere. It tells us that we were right and the doctors were wrong. George, and his personality, were in there the whole time".
What is persistent vegetative state? The condition of existing without consciousness or the ability to initiate voluntary action. Though people in this state may occasionally give the impression of being awake and sentient, making random movements and opening their eyes and even appearing to smile or cry, they are unable to respond to communication or demonstrate awareness of their environment.
This is different from an ordinary coma, in which the patient's eyes are closed, and which rarely last more than four weeks. The other key difference is that a person in a coma hasn't necessarily lost all cognitive function (ie, brain power); they are just temporarily unable to access it. If they recover - and many do - they may have cognition afterwards.
PVS is the result of damage to the cerebral cortex - the "thinking, feeling" part of the brain - but it is not to be confused with brain death. And while the "persistent" bit in the title indicates that the condition, unlike coma, is generally deemed permanent, there are intermittent reports of "recoveries".
Last week, it was reported that a 23-year-old woman who has been in a vegetative state since suffering devastating brain damage in a traffic accident was suddenly able to understand speech. And in 2003 an Arkansas man, Terry Wallis, returned to consciousness 19 years after he was injured in a car accident, stunning his mother by saying "Mom" and then asking for a drink of fizzy pop. Such breakthroughs are controversial, in both medical and legal circles. The British Medical Association, for example, currently deems such miraculous events not as recoveries from PVS, but as an indicator of an earlier misdiagnosis.
Because legal systems do not generally equate PVS with death, and diagnosis is difficult, there have been several famous court cases involving people in this condition.
The most high-profile centred on Terri Schiavo, a 26-year-old Florida woman who [is claimed to have gone] into a PVS after collapsing and suffering a heart attack in 1990. In 1998 her husband, Michael Schiavo, petitioned for her gastric feeding tube to be removed; her parents did not believe the diagnosis and took the case to court to prevent medical care being withdrawn. Ultimately, the court challenges were unsuccessful and in 2005 Schiavo's feeding tube was removed, leading to her death.
Up until now, there has been no treatment for PVS. Instead, the medical team concentrate on preventing infections and maintaining the patient's physical state as much as possible. The most common cause of death for a person in a vegetative state is infection such as pneumonia. For most such patients, life expectancy ranges from two to five years; survival beyond 10 years is unusual. [Helen Pidd, Guardian Newspapers Limited 2006; Guardian, 9/12/06, Reborn by Steve Boggan]
'I FELT TRAPPED INSIDE MY BODY' Kate, 36, communicates through a keyboard. Scientists have shown for the first time that a person diagnosed as being in a vegetative state can communicate. In 1997, when Kate was 26, she caught an acute viral infection. It was so serious that it confined her to a vegetative state for six months.
While she was in hospital, unresponsive and seemingly unaware of her surroundings, Cambridge neuroscientist Dr Adrian Owen, who went on to make this latest discovery, scanned her brain. He showed her familiar photographs, and realised from her brain activity that she was aware of the images that had been placed in front of her. As the months went on, and Dr Owen repeated the experiment, he found that Kate was becoming increasingly aware. The first memories she had, she says, lasted for a few minutes when her occupational therapist came in. "I could not move my face, so I could not show people how scared I was. Not being able to communicate was awful - I felt trapped inside my body. I had loads of questions, like 'Where am I?', 'Why am I here?', 'What has happened?'."
She said the scans changed everything. "I just have to look and see what the scans did for me. They found I was there inside my body that did not respond. Her parents, Bill and Gill Bainbridge, whom Kate lives with in Cambridgeshire, agree. "The scan meant an enormous amount to us," says Gill. "Up until then it had been very difficult for us to cope with the fact that she was in this vegetative state, and although she could do small things like move her finger or twist her neck, we didn't actually know what was going on with Kate.
After the scan, the doctors were able to tell us for the first time that Kate's brain was processing things." It took Kate a further two years to recover full consciousness, and according to Gill, Kate has continued to improve over the years. Kate thinks her recovery was spurred on by the scans. She said: "I think the work Dr Owen is doing is so important. I can remember how awful it was to be like I was. It really scares me to think what could have happened if I hadn't had the scan." [Rebecca Morelle, BBC, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5321460.stm, 7 September 2006]
|