Wednesday, April 16, 2014
 
 
  Home arrow End of Life / Euthanasia arrow Organ Donation / NHBD arrow Brain Death or NHBD – Important Distinction
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

A recently study [http://www.lifenews.com/nat6463.html] published in the American Journal of Public Health [online 17 June 2010] found that 14 percent of women who had abortions reported having experienced physical or sexual abuse at least once in the past year.

The survey of 986 women found that 10 percent reported physical abuse and 3 percent reported sexual abuse, with 74 percent of women reporting they were abused by a current partner and 24 percent reporting abuse by a previous partner (some women reported abuse by both current and former partners).

While the study only asked about the year prior to the abortion, many post- abortion counselors have found that many women who have had abortions report a history of sexual abuse,  perhaps in their childhood. Most discussion about abortion and sexual abuse concerns what happens if a woman or girl becomes pregnant as a result of rape or incest.

The book Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion  (http://www.theunchoice.com/forbiddengrief.htm) explores the further connection between abortion and a history of sexual abuse that may have occurred before the pregnancy took place.

Audrey Saftlas, Universiy of Iowa professor of epidemiology and lead author of the study, commented: "Women seeking termination of pregnancy comprise a particularly high-risk group for physical or sexual assault. In our study, almost 14 percent of women receiving an abortion reported at least one incident of physical or sexual abuse in the past year."

"These findings strongly support the need for clinic-based screening with interventions. These high-risk women need resources, referrals and support to help them and their families reduce the violence in their lives," Saftlas added.

 
Brain Death or NHBD – Important Distinction PDF Print E-mail
Article Index
Brain Death or NHBD – Important Distinction
Pressure for Organs Opens Pandora

For the past several years, a little-known but disturbing revolution has been occurring in organ donation.

In the understandable but sometimes alarming zeal to obtain more organs, the procedure called non-heart-beating organ donation (NHBD) has been quietly added to brain death organ donation in more and more hospitals all over the country.

Although “brain dead” is a term many people erroneously associate with a coma-like condition or use to humorously describe an ignorant person, brain death is a legal and medical term that describes the irreversible loss of total brain function, even when the body can be kept going for a while using technology such as a ventilator.

Since 1970, every state has added brain death to the legal and more familiar definition of death as the irreversible end of breathing and heartbeat.

The addition of brain death as a legal definition of death revolutionized organ transplantation, because waiting until a person died naturally to harvest organs often resulted in organs too damaged for successful transplant. 

With brain death, organs could be taken before breathing and heartbeat stopped, and organ transplantation became commonplace. But when brain death did not meet the demand for organs, NHBD was invented in the 1990s as a way to obtain more organs.

NHBD is very different from brain death organ donation.  

While brain death organ donation means the person is legally dead but still has a heartbeat when organs are harvested, the potential NHBD patient is alive but termed “hopeless” or “vegetative” by a doctor, usually soon after suffering a devastating condition like a severe stroke or trauma and while still needing a ventilator to breathe.

Because of the legal acceptance of the so-called “right to die”, families or patients can then agree to have the ventilator turned off, a “do not resuscitate” order written and the organs harvested if or when the person’s breathing and heart-beat stop.

In NHBD, the ventilator is usually stopped in an operating room while a doctor watches for up to one hour until the heart-beat and breathing stops.

After an interval of usually just two to five minutes, the patient is declared dead and the transplant team takes over to harvest the organs.

A determination of brain death is considered unnecessary even though Dr. Michael DeVita, one of the inventors of the NHBD protocol, has admitted, “the possibility of (brain function) recovery exists for at least 15 minutes”.

Nonetheless, Dr. DeVita defends waiting only two minutes before harvesting the organs because, as he writes, “the 2-minute time span probably fits with the layperson’s conception of how death ought to be determined”2 (emphasis added).

Just as disturbing, sometimes the NHBD patient will unexpectedly continue to breathe for longer than the one-hour time limit for NHBD. The transplant is then cancelled and the patient is just returned to his or her room to eventually die without treatment. Care is not resumed.

…[T]he rush to declare patients “hopeless” or “vegetative” soon after illness or injury can deprive at least some patients of the chance of survival or even recovery.

Shockingly, NHBD protocols do not even necessarily require that the donor be mentally impaired at all.



 
< Prev   Next >


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2014 All Rights Reserved