Wednesday, May 23, 2012
 
 
  Home arrow Stem Cells & Cloning arrow Legal Aspects of Euthanasia and PAS arrow Survival of the Fittest... Really?
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

Raising the Behavior Bar II

 

The most statistically significant risk protective factor against teen pregnancy is the perceived consequence of pregnancy....

The biggest surprise of this study is in the area of adolescent pledges of virginity.

The protective ability of a teen virginity pledge to remain abstinent is so statistically significant as to be in a league of its own.

In fact, the virginity pledge is three times greater a protective factor than the next greatest protective factor.

 

[JAMA (Journal of American Medical Assoc.), "Protecting Adolescents From Harm: Findings From the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health", September 1997; Add Health study, "Reducing the Risk:Connections That Make a Difference in the Lives of Youth", http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/faqs/addhealth/Reducing-the-risk.pdf ; http://www.mnddc.org/extra/risk/page1.htm ; http://casel.org/publications/reducing-the-risk-connections-that-make-a-difference-in-the-lives-of-youth/]

 
Survival of the Fittest... Really? PDF Print E-mail

Let the best survive --- so Darwinian...

Survival of Fittest is the concept we should believe... that's how our world evolved, we are told...

They then talk from the other side of their mouths regarding embryonic stem cell research funding and safe sex education funding...

Both embryonic stem cell research and safe sex education have been proven over and over to be at best ineffective and at worst huge failures -- "weaker" if you will than adult stem cell research and authentic abstinence education...

Yet, the liberals refuse to "let them die" a Darwinian death.

They insist that we continue to "nurture & protect" these non-survivable entities by continuing to fund them...with our tax dollars...

Let's demand that the liberals be consistent:

Either they have to admit that Darwinian thought is erroneous, in order to continue funding embryonic stem cell research and safe sex education;

OR they have to drop their support for embryonic stem cell research funding and safe sex funding in order to be consistent with their Darwinian theories.

 

THEY CANNOT - AND SHOULD NOT - HAVE IT BOTH WAYS... 

 

 

 
< Prev   Next >


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2012 All Rights Reserved