Tuesday, December 02, 2008
 
 
  Home arrow Birth Control arrow Sterilization arrow New HIV-Condom Oversight Has Some Worried...Perhaps They Should Be (7/04)
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

A 13-year study of pregnancy-associated deaths, published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, found that the maternal mortality rate associated with abortion is 2.95 times higher than the maternal mortality rate associated with pregnancies carried to term.

The study included the entire population of women 15-49 years of age in Finland, 1987-2000. The researchers linked birth and abortion records to death certificates.

The annual death rate of women who had abortions in the previous year was also 46% higher than that of non-pregnant women.

Women who carried to term (gave birth) had a significantly lower death rate than non-pregnant women.

Non-pregnant women had 57.0 deaths per 100,000, compared to only 28.2 for women who carried to term (gave birth), 51.9 for women who miscarried, and 83.1 deaths for women who had abortions.

[Gissler M, Berg C, Bouvier-Colle MH, Buekens P. Pregnancy-associated mortality after birth, spontaneous abortion or induced abortion in Finland, 1987-2000. Am J Ob Gyn 2004; 190:422-427. Finland National Research and Development Center]

 
New HIV-Condom Oversight Has Some Worried...Perhaps They Should Be (7/04) PDF Print E-mail

The Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has proposed a new set of rules that will guard the content of HIV/AIDS education resources, and contraception educators and promiscuity promoters are worried. In essence, they are concerned that the ineffectiveness of condoms will be revealed.

 

Under the proposed guidelines, as published in the June 16 Federal Register, the CDC would demand that all HIV/AIDS prevention resources funded by the CDC must be approved by a review panel for “medically accurate information regarding the effectiveness or lack of effectiveness of condoms in preventing the sexually transmitted disease the materials are designed to address.”

The truth that condoms do not offer complete protection against dangerous sexually transmitted diseases is not a message that large contraception-pushing “educators,” such as Planned Parenthood and Gay Men’s Health Crisis, like. Groups like GMHC have called the proposed guidelines equivalent to “moralizing.” By the same logic, it would be “moralizing” to put a warning label on cigarettes.

The CDC is accepting public comment on the proposed guidelines until August 16, 2004. Final guidelines are expected to be issued four months after that. [Gay City News, 06/30/04; Jessemyn Pekari, National Abstinence Clearinghouse E-mail Update 7Jul04]

 
< Prev   Next >


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2008 All Rights Reserved