Tuesday, October 14, 2008
 
 
  Home arrow Abortion arrow Abortion - Archive arrow Forced Abortion Case Heads to Supreme Court (5/04)
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

"There's no quick fix for pregnancy, no magic pill" -- Holly Patterson's sobbing father, 19Sept03, two days after Holly died from a massive bacterial infection following a failed RU-486 abortion dispensed from a Planned Parenthood center in California 

[Brewer, "Family Blames RU-486 in Woman's Death", Contra Costa Times, 9/20/03]

 
Forced Abortion Case Heads to Supreme Court (5/04) PDF Print E-mail

Forced Abortion Heads to SC - The United States Supreme Court has docketed the case Jane Roe II vs. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc. as Case No. 03-1447. In this case Jane Roe II, alleges that an abortionist at Aware Woman violated the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) law when he had her restrained during an unsuccessful abortion, even though she loudly and repeatedly demanded that he stop the procedure and let her leave.


 

The woman was apparently pinned down for an abortion at the Aware Woman Center for Choice in Melbourne, Florida while she screamed 'Stop!, Stop!, Stop!'. The abortionist did finally stop once the baby was dead and he had perforated her uterus and pulled part of her intestines out.

Jean Sapp, director of the Counselor Corps, an organization which trains reproductive health service providers said, "Forced abortions as well as non-consensual abortions of all kinds, are being done non-stop across America. These atrocities against mothers are our country's blackest unspoken secret."

The United States District Court in Orlando ruled against the victim. She appealed to the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta. The judges there held that the abortionist should be exonerated because he claimed to be helping the mother and acting in her best interest. Her appeal to the Supreme Court was filed by prominent attorney, Michael Hirsh of Atlanta, Georgia.

One concession granted by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta was the reference to Jane Roe II, an abortion patient, as a "mother" in their written opinion. [http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/may/04050602.html, LifeSite Daily News, 6May04]

 
< Prev   Next >


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2008 All Rights Reserved