Sunday, September 07, 2008
 
 
  Home arrow Abortion arrow Legal Aspects of Euthanasia and PAS arrow Freedom of Choice Act, New Version (FOCA) (2/04)
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

Advocates of "safe sex" – those with the idea of giving away condoms to students at school – must face the fact that there is no condom for the brain or heart. For them, the only negative consequences of teen sex they seem to care about are the physical dangers (and even then, with the high failure rate of condoms kids are never fully protected from either disease or pregnancy).

What about the emotional and psychological dangers?

Heritage Senior analyst Robert Rector explains that the consequences of teen-sex are felt for a lifetime: "Sexual activity by teens has both short-term and long-term negative psychological effects. It disputes their ability to develop loving, intimate and committed relationships and thereby creates great unhappiness in later life." Why don't groups like Planned Parenthood, etc., care about that?

The only way to truly protect kids from damaging their complete health is to teach them to wait until marriage.

[Sex, sadness and suicide, Heritage Fdn., 3Jun03; data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health, 1996, for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and 17 other federal agencies. The in-home survey (given with parental permission) interviewed 6,500 people 14-17 years old]

 
Freedom of Choice Act, New Version (FOCA) (2/04) PDF Print E-mail
Pro-abortion Senator Boxer introduced a new version of the Freedom of Choice Act which, if enacted, would invalidate any “statute, ordinance, regulation, administrative order, decision, policy, practice or any other action” of any federal, state or local gov’t that would “deny or interfere with” a woman’s right to abortion. It would establish “the absolute right to choose”. FOCA would invalidate: 1. gov’t restrictions on abortion funding; 2. prohibition of abortion in public hospitals; 3. women’s “right to know” laws [Boxer called these “anti-choice propaganda lectures”];  4. rights of conscience; and 5. prohibition of non-physicians from performing abortions. The bill would also “make it illegal for anyone or action that would discriminate against abortion”. It is endorsed by NARAL, NOW, Planned Parenthood, etc. [Nat’l Right to Life, 2/04; HLA Action News, Spring 2004]
 
< Prev   Next >


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2008 All Rights Reserved