Friday, February 10, 2012
 
 
  Home arrow Current Headlines arrow Technological Conception arrow Canadian Prenatal Screening Called a Reflection of "Nazi Style Eugenics" (3/04)
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

A recently study [http://www.lifenews.com/nat6463.html] published in the American Journal of Public Health [online 17 June 2010] found that 14 percent of women who had abortions reported having experienced physical or sexual abuse at least once in the past year.

The survey of 986 women found that 10 percent reported physical abuse and 3 percent reported sexual abuse, with 74 percent of women reporting they were abused by a current partner and 24 percent reporting abuse by a previous partner (some women reported abuse by both current and former partners).

While the study only asked about the year prior to the abortion, many post- abortion counselors have found that many women who have had abortions report a history of sexual abuse,  perhaps in their childhood. Most discussion about abortion and sexual abuse concerns what happens if a woman or girl becomes pregnant as a result of rape or incest.

The book Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion  (http://www.theunchoice.com/forbiddengrief.htm) explores the further connection between abortion and a history of sexual abuse that may have occurred before the pregnancy took place.

Audrey Saftlas, Universiy of Iowa professor of epidemiology and lead author of the study, commented: "Women seeking termination of pregnancy comprise a particularly high-risk group for physical or sexual assault. In our study, almost 14 percent of women receiving an abortion reported at least one incident of physical or sexual abuse in the past year."

"These findings strongly support the need for clinic-based screening with interventions. These high-risk women need resources, referrals and support to help them and their families reduce the violence in their lives," Saftlas added.

 
Canadian Prenatal Screening Called a Reflection of "Nazi Style Eugenics" (3/04) PDF Print E-mail
90% of Downs Syndrome children aborted in Canada /U.S. -- Tanis Doe, professor of social work at Victoria University, made the remarks to a group assembled at the University of Alberta. Doe said that pre-screening of pregnant women for genetic defects in their unborn children is a wide-spread practice in western nations. It is a widely-accepted idea that those children with defects should not be allowed to live -- a reality borne out by statistics -- 89 percent of Downs Syndrome babies in Canada, and 90 percent in the U.S. do not see the light of day. Doe, who is deaf and paraplegic, said that "Women are expected to -- pressured to -- abort pregnancies when fetal disability is diagnosed." She stated that, in Canada, there is "minimal support available to raise children with disabilities. Eugenics was practised in the U.K., Canada and the United States before the rise of Hitler," she asserted. "So what has happened since then is a continuation of the sterilization practices that we have only recently acknowledged." Dick Sobsey, director of the University of Alberta's developmental disability centre told the Globe and Mail that her statement, though contentious, is historical. Alberta actively sterilized the mentally handicapped between the years 1928 and 1972, a move that has cost the province $800 million in compensation. Sobsey said that the decision to abort a disabled child is no different from the decision to abort a child with an undesirable gender, although the latter is still considered by most Canadians as barbarous. "Genetic counselling of pregnant women emerged from the eugenics movement," Sobesy said. "Before the Second World War there was a very robust eugenics movement in North America, in Alberta particularly. But the Nazis discredited the movement, so I think there was a move to a less direct form of eugenics."  ["McGill Speaker Condemns New 'Eugenics'" http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2002/oct/021010.html; "America the Model for Nazi Eugenics? 'Biological courts, forced sterilisation, detention for the socially inadequate,' and euthanasia were among the pre-war 'American eugenic accomplishments.'" [EDMONTON, 18Mar04 LifeSiteNews.com; Nancy V., 19Mar04; http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/feb/04020905.html]
 
< Prev   Next >

Current News

Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2012 All Rights Reserved