Tuesday, December 02, 2008
 
 
  Home arrow End of Life / Euthanasia arrow Euthanasia Archive arrow Model Resolution to Protect Patients
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

     A report shows that sexually active teens are far more likely to be depressed and to attempt suicide than those who hold off until marriage. More than a quarter (25%) of teen girls who said they were sexually active also said they had been depressed "a lot of the time" or "most or all of the time" in the previous week, compared to 7.7% of girls who said they weren't sexually active.

And, 60.2% of girls who refrained from sex said they were "never or rarely" depressed, compared to just 36.8 percent of sexually active girls. For boys, 8.3% of those who were sexually active reported problems with depression, compared to just 3.4% for those who weren't.  

Girls who were sexually active were 3 times more likely to say they had attempted suicide than those who weren't. Sexually active boys were nearly 9 times more likely to have attempted suicide.

The majority of teens who had become sexually active admitted they'd started too soon and expressed regret.

[Sex, sadness and suicide, Heritage Fdn., 3Jun03; data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health, 1996, for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and 17 other federal agencies. The in-home survey (given with parental permission) interviewed 6,500 people 14-17 years old]

 
Model Resolution to Protect Patients PDF Print E-mail

WHEREAS: The Arizona Medical Association is opposed to euthanasia, including “physician-assisted suicide”; and

WHEREAS: The diagnosis of Persistent Vegetative State cannot be made with certainty,” being mistaken in up to 43% of cases, especially when functional neuroimaging has not been performed; and

WHEREAS: Patients in a “minimally conscious state” or with a “locked-in syndrome” may be aware of their surroundings yet unable to communicate this awareness; and


 

WHEREAS: Patients with severe brain injury, who may be diagnosed as being in a Persistent Vegetative State, are often not terminally ill; and

WHEREAS: Severely disabled patients may nonetheless desire to live, regardless of what their expressed premorbid wishes may have been; and

WHEREAS: Death from thirst or starvation can be extremely painful; and

WHEREAS: Disabled persons look upon their feeding tubes as “assistive devices” that permit them to be nourished without tremendous burdens on caregivers and without the distress of choking spells; and

WHEREAS: Withholding fluids and food from a person who is not terminally ill (i.e. almost certain to die in less than a week) is a method of deliberately causing death that would not otherwise occur, and

WHEREAS: it is unlawful to execute a person who is not mentally competent, even if guilty of committing a crime at a time when he was mentally competent; and

WHEREAS: even mentally disabled patients are persons who are entitled to protection against deliberate infliction of pain or death,

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT: The Arizona Medical Association oppose as unethical the withdrawal of fluids and nutrition from a patient who is not terminally ill, unless the patient is mentally competent, capable of expressing in some way his current wishes, and affirms his rejection of food and fluids to the point of becoming unarousable; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Arizona Medical Association defines enteral feeding and hydrating of patients as humane care rather than as medical care, even if a nasogastric or gastrostomy tube is required; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Arizona Medical Association exhort physicians to refuse to participate in the dehydration or starvation of mentally incompetent persons, as well as the execution of any person, and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Arizona Medical Association direct its delegation to present and advocate the adoption of a similar resolution by the American Medical Association.

[This is a MODEL resolution. It has not been approved by the Arizona Medical Association at this time. It is offered as a model for state medical associations to use in writing their own resolutions.]

 http://www.aapsonline.org/resolutions/resol23.htm
 

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc.
1601 N. Tucson Blvd. Suite 9
Tucson, AZ 85716-3450
Phone: (800) 635-1196
Hotline: (800) 419-4777
 A Voice for Private Physicians Since 1943
Omnia pro aegroto

 
< Prev


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2008 All Rights Reserved