Wednesday, December 03, 2008
 
 
  Home arrow Abortion arrow Abortion Research Studies arrow UNC Study: Protection Against Future Breast Cancer (OGS, 1/2003)
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

It's not the FUNDS that are Lacking for Embryonic Stem Cell Research.
It's the Results.

Successful human trials/treatments using Embryonic Stem Cells: 0
Successful human trials/treatments/cures using Adult Stem Cells: 72
 
FDA approved human trials using embryonic stem cells -- 0
FDA approved clinical trials using adult stem cells -- 1,181
 
Embryonic stem cells have been used in ANIMAL trials for 25 years.
After 25 years, and many thousands of dead mice and rats, ESCs have not been shown safe enough for trials in humans, mainly because of their propensity to form tumors (grow uncontrollably), and because of their rejection problems.


[Life Insight, June-July 2006]

 
UNC Study: Protection Against Future Breast Cancer (OGS, 1/2003) PDF Print E-mail

FIRST PREGNANCY DELIVERED vs FIRST PREGNANCY ABORTED

A GAIL MODEL RISK ANALYSIS

The protective effect of an early first full term pregnancy against future development of breast cancer has been undisputed for 35 years.

The landmark study establishing this protective effect [MacMahon, et al, (1970) Bulll WHO 43:209-221] is widely accepted in the medical world.  

MacMahon, and group reanalyzed their 1970 data [Trichopolous D,  Hsieh C, MacMahon B, Lin T, et al,, Age at any Birth and Breast Cancer Risk, International J Cancer, 1983:31:70l-704], finding that each one year delay in the first full term pregnancy increased relative breast cancer risk by 3.5% (compounded). 

Obviously, aborting a first pregnancy eliminates the protective effect against breast cancer.

In an attempt to calculate the risk in numbers that both patient and physician can more readily relate to, Thorp applied the Gail model risk analysis to typical real-life situations (Thorp et al., Long Term Physical and Psychological Health Consequences of Induced Abortion: Review of the Evidence; Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, Vol 58, #1, Jan 2003, pp 75,76). 

The following discussion, including tables 8, 9, and 10, are excerpted directly from this reference. 

"We think, given the undisputed protective effect of a full-term delivery early in one's reproductive life on subsequent breast cancer development, that a young woman facing an unwanted or crisis pregnancy can and should be informed that the loss of that protection would derive from her decision to terminate her pregnancy and delay
having a baby  (98, 101). 

To illustrate, Table 8 uses the Gail Equation to predict 5-year
and lifetime risk of breast carcinoma for an 18 year-old woman with an unintended or crisis pregnancy.  The Gail model (99) is considered the best available measure for estimating an individual woman's risk of developing breast cancer.
 
In the first scenario, she decides to terminate and then has her first term delivery at age 32;  in the second scenario, she has a live-born infant.  We then assess her individual risk at age 50, when the risk of breast cancer begins to peak.  For both black and white women, her decision at age 18, and her subsequent reproductive choices, can almost double her 5-year and lifetime risk of breast neoplasia at age 50. 

Tables 8, 9, and 10 demonstrate that the "loss of protection" effect is most pronounced in women under 20 years of age who elect to undergo abortion rather than continue their pregnancy

Clinicians [should be] "obliged to inform every pregnant woman that a decision to abort her first pregnancy may almost double her lifetime risk of breast cancer through loss of the protective effect of a completed first full-term pregnancy earlier in life."

(References are not reproduced here, but are available in the Thorp et al. original article)
[Joe DeCook, MD for AAPLOG]

 
< Prev   Next >


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2008 All Rights Reserved