Sunday, February 12, 2012
 
 
  Home arrow End of Life / Euthanasia arrow End of Life Care/Issues arrow Study: Therapy Helps Stroke Patients Speak (6/05)
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

Far from reducing the number of abortions, contraception to some extent finds in abortion a natural unfolding.

Given that the contraceptive mentality is in fact close to the abortive mentality, large-scale use of contraception in the developed nations has contributed to the routine use of abortion.

Scientific research today is oriented towards the development of increasingly “effective” contraceptive techniques to prevent conception and [to prevent] the continuation of pregnancy, with increasingly less risk to the woman, resulting in increasingly abortifacient contraception.

This is a further demonstration of the close link, not only cultural but also scientific, between the use of contraception and the demand for abortion.

To avoid uttering the word “abortion”, people talk about the pharmacological “prevention” of implantation, “interception” or “contragestion”.

It is also asserted that the embryo is not an embryo as long as it is not implanted in the lining of the uterus, but simply a “pre-embryo”, a mass of cells which does not call for any particular respect.

However, a play on words cannot change the reality of the facts.

[Those] who, verbally or in writing, endorse the use of contraception, must know that, in so doing, they are endorsing all the abortions thereby caused and to be caused, which will amount to millions of individuals.

[Jacques Suaudeau, http://www.dialoguedynamics.com/content/learning-forum/interviews-and-articles/article/mons-jacques-suaudeau-on-the-link]

 
Study: Therapy Helps Stroke Patients Speak (6/05) PDF Print E-mail

"Intensive therapy with people who suffered a stroke years earlier seems to improve their speaking ability, a small study suggests, offering hope to stroke victims and their families...

'Anything that sort of tests our old thinking, which is that you can't get better after a year, I always think is exciting,' said Dr. Marilyn Rymer [med dir, Saint Luke's Mid America Brain and Stroke Institute, Kansas City, MO] who was not involved in the study.

Researchers looked at 27 stroke survivors - 16 men and 11 women with an average age of 51 - who had suffered for about four years from varying degrees of aphasia, problems with speaking and comprehending words following a stroke.

About 700,000 people each year experience a new or recurrent stroke in the United States. Signs of a stroke include a sudden loss of vision in one or both eyes, sudden loss of strength or sensation on one side of the body and slurred speech or a change in language.

The patients in the study were given 30 hours of speech training - three hours a day over a period of 10 days. Before the training, the patients had trouble finding the right words or understanding what other people said.

They improved right away after the training and that progress was maintained six months later.

Lead author of the study, Marcus Meinzer of the Unversitat Konstanz in Konstanz, Germany, said that about 38 percent of stroke survivors have aphasia after a stroke on the left side of the brain. While there is often spontaneous improvement in patients during the first six months after a stroke, as many as 60 percent still have problems speaking six months later.

The therapists used games to encourage patients to speak rather than relying on gestures to communicate. Players had to ask for cards that matched the images on cards given to them. He said that they tested language functions like naming, repeating words and sentences, comprehension and written language.

Researchers found that language skills improved in 85 percent of the patients. Dr. David C. Hess, chairman and professor of neurology at Medical College of Georgia in Augusta, noted that the median age of the group was quite young. 'This is a younger group and younger brains recover better than older brains.'
Dr. James C. Grotta, professor of neurology and director of the stroke program at the University of Texas Medical School at Houston, warned the results are preliminary and patients shouldn't expect miraculous recoveries. But he did say that the study offers hope. 'To improve a person's language is dramatic four years after a stroke,' Dr. Robert Felberg, director of the stroke program at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation in New Orleans."
[American Heart Association journal Stroke; AP, http://www.firstcoastnews.com/health/news-article.aspx?storyid=38753, 10June05]

 
< Prev   Next >


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2012 All Rights Reserved