Saturday, July 31, 2010
 
 
  Home arrow Abortion arrow Incest, Rape, Congenital Abnormalities arrow Abortion & the Supreme Court: What the Court Actually Said
Main Menu
Home
About Us
Current Headlines
Abortion
Abstinence
Birth Control
End of Life / Euthanasia
Medical Research
Medical Students
Population
Position Statements
Pregnancy/Development
STDs
Stem Cells & Cloning
Contact Us
Web Links
Site Index
Resources
Related Items
Translator
Quotes to Note

We are now seeing the cloning of humans, mixtures of human and animal embryos, embryonic stem cell research (which makes and then destroys human embryos), the destruction of "extra" frozen IVF human embryos, and the sale of human fetal body parts, all presented by the media in very desensitizing ways. 

We must recognize that every abortion and every embryo produced and destroyed for "research" causes the death of a living, defenseless human being, who would come to birth if allowed to develop in an uninterrupted way.

Every one of these could be our neighbor, relative, or friend.

Would we want someone we know to be treated this way?

Why do we then allow it to happen just because we haven't met these little ones?

Dignity is due to every human life from fertilization through the moment of natural death.

-- Michael Lathem, M.D. 

 
Abortion & the Supreme Court: What the Court Actually Said PDF Print E-mail

On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court in two separate decisions (Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton) ruled that any state abortion law in the future would have to meet the following guidelines:

First Trimester: During the first three months of pregnancy, the state must leave the abortion decision entirely to a woman and her physician.

Second Trimester: After the 1st trimester and until viability, the state may only enact laws which regulate abortions in ways “reasonably related to material health.” This simply means that a state may determine who is qualifited to perform the abortion and where it may take place. The state may not, however, enact laws to safeguard the lives of the unborn.

After Viability: (Now 20 weeks but then estimated by the Court at sixth or seventh month of pregnancy.) The law may forbid her to have an abortion that is not determined to be necessary to preserve her “life or health”. The Court went on to define the word “health” in such broad terms – i.e. social well-being – as to make it virtually impossible for a state to protect the unborn child at any time during the nine months. 

Thus, 7 Justices of the Supreme Court (9 total), disregarding prior legal tradition, overwhelming biological evidence and the ethical traditions of a majority of the American people, struck down the abortion laws of all 50 states (even the most permissive at the time) and made abortion on demand, at virtually every state of pregnancy, the law of the land.

On January 22, 1973, the Court gave the United States the dubious distinction of having the most permissive abortion law of any nation in the western world. Both Roe and Doe were decided by 7-2 votes.

 
< Prev   Next >


Go to top of page  Home | About Us | Current Headlines | Abortion | Abstinence | Birth Control | End of Life / Euthanasia | Medical Research | Medical Students | Population | Position Statements | Pregnancy/Development | STDs | Stem Cells & Cloning | Contact Us | Web Links | Site Index | Resources |
 
PhysiciansForLife.org Copyright (C) 2004-2010 All Rights Reserved